Abstract
Individual differences in employees' affective dispositions influence how they perceive the work environment and report their well-being. A recurring challenge in this literature is that self-reported measures of working conditions and well-being cannot easily distinguish objective environmental features from the perceptual lens through which employees report them. Using a large, stratified sample of Danish employees (T1 N = 3970; T2 N = 2375) and the Danish Psychosocial Questionnaire, we quantified the extent to which positive and negative affect account for associations between work environment perceptions and employee well-being. Partial correlations, both cross-sectional and longitudinal over six months, showed that two brief affect measures accounted for an average of 73-75% of the observed associations. These findings suggest that a substantial portion of commonly reported work environment-well-being associations reflects stable individual differences in affective dispositions rather than objective environmental conditions-with direct implications for how self-report surveys are designed and interpreted in research and practice.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Scientific Reports |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| ISSN | 2045-2322 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2026 |
Keywords
- Humans
- Working Conditions
- Individuality
- Psychological Well-Being
- Affect
- Female
- Workplace/psychology
- Male
- Adult
- Denmark
- Surveys and Questionnaires
- Cross-Sectional Studies
- Self Report
- Middle Aged
- Perception
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Individual differences in affect explaining work environment perceptions and later wellbeing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver